the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given maps illustrate information about changes in the Grange Park since 1920 to nowadays.
Overall, it could be clearly seen that today Underground car park was built, and also Glass House gave way to Cafè and Children’s play area.
In the upside and downside of park there are located two Entrances, which did not change through 2 years. Additionally, Stage for musicians was significantly improved and it became a big Amphitheater for concerts.
In 1920, Fountain and Pond for water plants were located in different areas. However, in these days they were connected , and changed to green, beautiful Water feature.
In the beginning of the period, Seats and Rose Garden were situated in different places, but nowadays, all of them are locating in the center of the park, and became more beautiful together.
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation.What might be be the case?What could be disadvantages of being self-employed? 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 78
- - 11
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation.What might be be the case?What could be disadvantages of being self-employed? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wever, in these days they were connected , and changed to green, beautiful Water f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 699.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21641791045 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7751988028 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.716417910448 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4215679542 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134371907257 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589416211402 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435560809674 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744901522092 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410674374117 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.