People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Deep commitment to an idea or policy can strengthen its execution, and thus, realize the idea into what it potentially ought to be as conceived by the proponents of it. Having such resolve to see a plan through can invite a multitude of challenges but also provide the necessary utility at disposal for overcoming all trials and tribulations. But while the commitment to an idea is important, the executioner can get blinded by a sense of responsibility, and consequently lose objectivity. Therefore, while commitment is an important aspect to any idea to come to fruition, a critical analysis is inextricably intertwined with the completion which is not completely critical, and so I disagree with the issue at hand for the most part due to many cogent reasons with some concessions that can be made in favor of it, but only circumstantially, but set for failure nonetheless.
To begin, the issue statement shoulders the people with much responsibility and provides leeway when it comes to scrutiny. While committing allows someone to entrench themselves into the thoroughgoing of the execution, people with commitments, like any human being, are fallible. Objectivity is compromised. Although the commitment that they put forth is quite compelling and suggestive of their critical position on the subject matter, it is that very commitment that makes the criticism purported by the individuals tenuous. Why would the individual be so enamored by the idea as to see to it that it is completed? It raises questions of personal biases and could lead to evidence of dissonance between personal goals and the goals of the policy itself.
Furthermore, just because an individual or a group of individuals buttress a plan or policy does not directly imply that they have the intellectual or experiential capacity to make critical judgment about the plans. For instance, a government taking decisions on a number of diverse fields does not require the government officials to be critical of them.A party during its power in government does not need to be critical about its plans in order to support them vehemently. Rather they can hire experts in the field to make the correct assessments. In addition, A political leader might come up with a populist strategy to appease the public and promise tax cuts. This does not provide enough premise to conclude that the idea has been critically analyzed by the politician personally.
Perhaps, there are defenses against the position being presented with statements which suggest that the people who support the idea are the ones deeply involved in those policies, and therefore, they would be the most critical about those thoughts or school of thoughts that they are touting because it reflects on them on a personal as well as an institutional level. But what is to guarantee that they are supporting those policies with objective acumen? There could be strategic advantages to supporting even bad ideas. There have been many cases in identity politics when ideas are strongly voiced in order for the verdict of the votes to reach an impasse.
Hence, while there are refutes to the disagreement with the position held in this essay, they are merely rhetoric exercise and will prove to be futile once the issue is properly dissected and logic is implemented to assail the problem at hand. So, it only seems correct to disagree with the issue statement and hold my position against the idea that people who support a policy are more inclined to be critical of it. Finally, I would conclude by resonating with my position and stating that this position is merely an individual's and I am more than welcome to a more critical analysis if one were to be proposed for discussion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | NobodyUp | 66 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 66
- Solving a problem can be broken down into several steps. First, the problem must be identified correctly. Psychologists refer to this step as problem representation. For many problems, figuring out which information is relevant and which is extraneous van 88
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.Write a response 58
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 83
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... commitment to an idea is important, the executioner can get blinded by a sense o...
^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssue statement shoulders the people with much responsibility and provides leeway ...
^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...rnment officials to be critical of them.A party during its power in government do...
^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ns in order to support them vehemently. Rather they can hire experts in the field to m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3112.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 617.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04376012966 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92778250636 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482982171799 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1009.8 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.8210638526 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.454545455 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0454545455 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26462458572 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701718970141 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595777718686 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150455610857 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420880058184 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 100.480337079 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.