These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.
Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
In these recent decades, people who have various generations work together in the same workplace and it is extremely normal. However, it can have both pros and cons. They have different thought and mindset. In contrast, they can help to each other to improve at their workplace. From my point of view, they should work together and attitude to be a positive person for their company and it has more advantages. In this essay, the aforementioned will be discussed.
It is certainly obvious that people in different generations have various dreams and sometimes they are not able to understand each other. It can incline to create many problems at work. For instance, the youth want to learn more and achieve their goals as soon as possible and they are extremely active in their workplace although, the middle age employees tend to be a manager and they do not want to learn more or sometimes they don not have a tendency to work. In this condition, young people believe that the old one cannot work and the elderly do not allow the young to improve simultaneously.
Another issue is that these both generations can help to each other. Definitely the elderly has a wide range of experience and they can teach them to the youth. Moreover, the young people can respect them and realize that they are precious for their organization and also utilize of their knowledge. Hence, both categories can work in the same room.
All in all, in spite of the fact that both groups have different targets and thinking, they can improve the level of the organizations. In addition, both generations can learn several things from each other. Personally, I have been learning several issues from my colleagues who are older than me and I am grateful that have been knowing these people.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe that one can get information from the internet or books. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Due the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a dramatic change to people’s lives. Is it a positive or negative development?Give your opinion and examples. 61
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- NUMEROUS PEOPLE NOWADAYS SUFFER FROM INSOMNIApeople sleep less than before in many countries. why do people sleep less? what effects does it have on individuals and society? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[1]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'have known'
Suggestion: have known
...re older than me and I am grateful that have been knowing these people.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...der than me and I am grateful that have been knowing these people.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81639344262 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61682481345 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481967213115 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.180128357 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4117647059 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149687661097 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576449680316 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388598496838 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104095078276 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370350389246 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.