Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Other believes that women’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children’s. Which opinion do you agree with and why?
The implication of women should be given equal chances to work, but other think women’s role should be limited ti taking care of the house and children’s which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous areas. The sizeable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this tread. I am agreeing with the statement and this will be further discussed before reaching logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one steams from the facts that women work in more field like doctor, advocate, police and so many jobs.
Now day’s women are very educated. Women’s do any field’s in their life. I think women should be equal chances to work their careers.
The importance of some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Other believes that women role should be limited to taking care of the house and children’s can be debated but the fact remains that there were several factors that lead to this theme and matter. Eventually according to the above analysis it can be concluded that women’s want to do work and it is necessary for women’s it can be predicated that in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | Yadwinder randhawa | 77 | view |
- It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- Mobile phones 77
- In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Give your opinion whether formal written examination is an effective way to assess students. 55
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individual? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...r the potential impact of this tread. I am agreeing with the statement and this will be fur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04147465438 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74659017064 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5831157681 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.25397266985 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.662700141654 0.242375264174 273% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.282394245228 0.0925447433944 305% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195382701393 0.071462118173 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392649234641 0.151781067708 259% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198140901463 0.0609392437508 325% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.