The business manager of the television station asserts that the time for the local news as well as the weather news has to be increased during the late night news program. He makes an assumption that this decreased time intenval for these two types of news resulted in the loss of local advertisement revenues. But, the manager might hold water as his conclusion relies on some of the unfounded assumptions. If they are not substantiated in a viable manner, they might dramatically weaken the persuasiveness of the conclusion.
Firstly, the manager states about the complaints received from viewers. He states that the viewers are in need of local and weather news. But, he fails to think that if the national news time is affected, then the current viewers of the national news may get uncomfortable or unsatisfied. This may lead to further loss of the Television station. He fails to mentions how many number of people asserted to this change and also fails to accord that there may be more complaints in the future if there is increase in time for the weather or local news.
Nevertheless, the author fails to mention the relationship between the local news and the advertisements. The advertisements are made by the companies where the density of eyes of people is maximum. Having neglecting the national news people fail to acknowledge the advertisements by changing the stations. Even though this seems persuasive, the business manager fails to consider the aspect that the local business can give their ads during the day times too by shifting their timings. If the Television station is the national level station -which is again not mentioned-, the there is an inadvertent need for it to concentrate more on the national issues rather than more concentration on the local issues. Thus, if the assertion of the manager if followed, may incur the loss to the station in turn.
The Business manager also fails to mention that if the viewers who complained are really the viewers of the late night news. Even though if he wants to go along with their concerns, he still fails to think that the news time can be augmented rather than cutting short. If the late night news is so important aspect of the television station, then the business manager might have asserted to augment the show time by increasing the local and weather news rather than cutting off the national news.
In a nutshell, if few unfounded assumptions made by the business manager of the Television station are substantiated clearly, then the conclusion might have got ossified by diverge ground works. Therefore, if the substantiations given in the previous paragraphs are considered the business manager may come to the second conclusion regarding the time interval given for the local and weather news in the late night show.
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening th 89
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 83
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 56
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- GRE Issue:Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people 66
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/over-past-year-our…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 471 350
No. of Characters: 2293 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.659 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.868 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.736 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.55 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.415 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.363 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.541 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... hold water as his conclusion relies on some of the unfounded assumptions. If they are not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a viable manner" with adverb for "viable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...umptions. If they are not substantiated in a viable manner, they might dramatically weaken the per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
... of the Television station. He fails to mentions how many number of people asserted to t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...ision station. He fails to mentions how many number of people asserted to this change and a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, really, regarding, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 471.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97664543524 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80333901203 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407643312102 0.468620217663 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8149375174 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.55 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.70786347227 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327823822115 0.218282227539 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117224189699 0.0743258471296 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107111379878 0.0701772020484 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219174544855 0.128457276422 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748728311602 0.0628817314937 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.