Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in
many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be
required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.
To what extent do you agree?
In many companies, strategic level positions, such as directors, CFO’s and GM’s are occupied by men despite the fact that women hold more than 50 percent jobs in many developed nations. I don’t agree to the suggestion of fixing a quota of these position based on gender to women only. The main reasons are lack of relevant skills for such jobs and encouragement of gender discrimination.
It is true that the women hold more jobs than men in many developed nations, however it does not necessarily mean that they have the relevant skills for high level jobs. Many important job roles require, strategic and management skills which may not be possessed by majority of women. Having more number of jobs simple does not imply that all women are holding management jobs. Fixing the quota or percentage for such roles may result in many positions being vacant due to lack of relevant skills. For example in Pakistan many women do not pursue accountancy qualifications, if the quota is fixed for high level accountancy roles , there would be shortage of skill and the position would remain vacant.
Secondly, allocation of a predetermined number of positions will encourage gender discrimination as the selection may not happen on the merit basis. This would demotivate the employees of other gender i.e. men. If a percentage is fixed for women, there are high chances that a male applicant who is more skillful may not be selected and this may also result in un-employment of skilled people. For example, in a Sindh province of Pakistan, a quota is fixed in universities of Karachi for rural areas due to which many deserving students in the urban areas don’t get the admission.
In the conclusion, I would like to state that, fixing of quota for any type of job will definitely employ more women, however it may lead to inappropriate hiring of staff due to a lack of relevant skills, further more it may encourage gender discrimination and also cause demotivation in men due to unemployment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-31 | Irfan Muhammad Rehmat | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s fixed for high level accountancy roles , there would be shortage of skill and th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9940652819 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88304311574 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480712166172 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3514663131 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.461538462 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148127453276 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645038329883 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427878412843 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994444975185 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355552097005 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.