Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree?
There is a controversial issue about the responsibility of tourists. Some ecologists state that they should take both social and environmental obligations. In this essay, I will agree with their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why some ecologists propagate that people in other countries should be responsible for local communities and environment. The first reason is that they tend to behave courteously in tourist destinations, if they accept the difference of social aspects. Tourists usually behave with respect to locals, as soon as they accept the culture of the country they visit, no matter how different it may look from what they used to seeing in their home country. Another reason is that they become more eco-friendly. Tourism frequently cause considerable damage to local ecosystem, but as tourists become accountable for local nature, there environmental situation will improve. As a result, when tourists take obligation for the communities and ecological condition of the country they visit, the resentment from local communities will become lower.
However, some businessmen argue that tourists should not made socially as well as environmentally responsible. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, tourists pay for all the discomfort they create to locals. Tourists want to relax in other countries, and any attempts to restrict their desire by these obligations would deter them from visiting that country again, which would substantially decrease national income from the tourist industry. Secondly, local authorities should take these responsibilities instead. Officials should protect communities from the annoyance of tourists, if they do not want to interact with them. They also should work better with ecological problems in the area, since they receive enough money from tourism taxation. Therefore, it is unfair to demand tourists to become either socially or environmentally accountable, because they buy expensive holiday packages, which already include the compensation for the problems they can pose.
In conclusion, even though some businessmen believe that tourists should be exempted from any responsibilities, I think that they should be encouraged to become courteous to communities and environment for the above mentioned reasons.
- What are the pros and cons of using public transport? 84
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family To what extent do you agree with this 84
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- The international community should do more to tackle the threat of global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...inessmen argue that tourists should not made socially as well as environmentally res...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69075144509 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08053576912 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557803468208 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3880844593 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.388888889 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226153339813 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794699841593 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681394223583 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153299600152 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00932363107742 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.