Many companies sell product or services but at the same time cause environmental damage. Some said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty, such as a higher tax when they cause the environment damage. Other said there are better ways to stop them from harming environment. What do you think is the best way to prevent the environment from deteriorating?
With the development of the society. More and more folks pay their attention about environment affair. People hotly debate that how we can prevent environment damage from companies’ products or services. Ones strongly support that take a higher environment tax as penalty to these companies, others holds that there are many better methods to protect the environment. From my own perspective, I take the side with the latter one.
First of all, penalty tax is useless for protecting environment for companies. We have to admit that concrete is necessary for common life. However, producing concrete is one of the most pollutant industry in the world. We are unable to close these kind of industry or put a higher tax as penalty, because this penalty not only cannot help us to protect the environment from deteriorating but also raise people’s life cost. Let me explain it into details. It is not hard to imagine that if government put a penalty tax to a company which produce concrete. Then this company will raise the price of concert per ton for compensation. After that construction will also raise the price of apartment for get a normal profit. At last, the people take the consequence of penalty tax. But the company itself will not be harmed by the higher tax. So I believe that higher tax is unable to help to solve the problem.
In addition, it is unfair for company to take the penalty for inevitable damage to environment.
Plastic bags are the most ordinary thing in our daily life. For getting the material, it takes a set of procedure to synthesis chemical compounds. During these steps, it will damage the environment. But everyone takes advantage of plastic. So it is unfair to let the company which produce plastic bags to bear the penalty. What’s more, we need plastic in so many areas. Researchers need plastic container to contain some dangerous liquid, because it will erodes the glass. People prefer plastic bags when they go shopping. Besides, plastic is also a ingredients for clothing. In conclusion that plastic in everywhere in our life, we take the convince form plastic, then we should also take the damage from producing plastic. It should not let the company to take the price alone.
At last but not least, we have to admit that higher penalty will help to some extent. Like it will force the company to update old and inefficient equipment to latest generation equipment with filtering the toxic matter. However, company are not willing to update the equipment, since there are unaffordable tax to import the equipment from foreign country. I believe that government lower down the tax for the goods. Companies are willing to update their equipment. Everyone is eager to obtain the latest and efficient equipment. Therefore, beyond the penalty tax, there are far more great methods to prevent companies to deteriorate the environment.
To warp up, I believe that we should consider about other gentle methods for protect our environment. There are more vital and effective aspects to complete like I mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | djgjdkncsajf | 70 | view |
- TPO 48 85
- Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be navigating by the stars, 70
- Summary the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points in the reading passage. 100
- TPO46 71
- TPO 50 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ry in the world. We are unable to close these kind of industry or put a higher tax as pena...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 460, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'erode'
Suggestion: erode
... some dangerous liquid, because it will erodes the glass. People prefer plastic bags w...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 553, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y go shopping. Besides, plastic is also a ingredients for clothing. In conclusion...
^
Line 6, column 553, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a ingredient' or simply 'ingredients'?
Suggestion: a ingredient; ingredients
...y go shopping. Besides, plastic is also a ingredients for clothing. In conclusion that plasti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 643, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...stic in everywhere in our life, we take the convince form plastic, then we should also take ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 158, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...to update old and inefficient equipment to latest generation equipment with filtering the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.017578125 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7238686269 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455078125 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.0 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.6003584229 180% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5115467979 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.4324324324 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8378378378 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.97297297297 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142048164054 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03811988488 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376933145871 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799035668327 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441966854774 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.