Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people say that we should not give priority to learning history or anything related to ancient times because it could not lay foundations for later learning and living. From my perspective, I completely disagree with this and believe that this would be beneficial for human studies as well as medicine.
Indeed, learning about the past is of fundamental importance for people, especially anthropologists, who want to conduct advanced research on human studies. The research, which consists of observing and comparing between modern humans and their ancestors would help them gain detailed insights into their cultures and traditions. For instance, by observing bones’ structures of apes, scientists and researchers can figure out whether they are designed for hunting and gathering or not. This example indicates that these sorts of information may benefit research into humans regarding changes in different periods, which could arouse people an interest and passion for human studies.
Furthermore, alongside the influence of human studies, I believe that history also plays an indispensable role in medical development. In the past, people living in ancient times may experience various types of fatal disease due to the shortage of proper treatment. However, medical research into solutions has been improved recently. For instance, by decoding DNA of corpses, who are examined to be dead by tuberculosis, well-qualified doctors and experts can find out the cause of this, which is due to infectious bacteria. Therefore, this is a contributing factor in future medical treatments such as antibiotics or vaccines, which prevent people from the susceptibility to diseases that our ancestors were prone to.
In conclusion, although some people say that it is time-consuming and pointless to learn about the past, I argue that people should not dismiss history because of the mentioned reasons above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Adeola Nafisat | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | Adeola Nafisat | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | pbansal | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | marin123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | marin123 | 61 | view |
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating. 61
- Some think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the Internet or books. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems? Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for human studies as well as medicine. Indeed, learning about the past is of fu...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nterest and passion for human studies. Furthermore, alongside the influence of ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ases that our ancestors were prone to. In conclusion, although some people say ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55972696246 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98643588364 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610921501706 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7024742373 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126039751823 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471646002363 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399478184719 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811514640081 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177308380592 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.