There is no shortage of debates about how to improve and guarantee the evolution of the country by funding in effective ways. Personally, I completely agree that governments can allocate more money for education of undergraduate students than that for school age children. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
Initially granted, because undergraduate students are more creative and perceptive, they can be better and can flourish the conditions of the country, if they are funded in a greater amount. It is clear that their intelligence level allows them to do researches and understand circumstances of the day. My own experience is a good example for this reason. Students of the university in which my brother is studying have developed a modern robot available for multiple purposes and this contributed a great benefit to agriculture field of the country; it was the result of the funding the government allocated for the university. In addition to this reason, governments can gain some money by funding the universities for education, such as technologies, projects, and discoveries the students developed. Therefore, the creativeness and intelligence of the children can attract governments to allocate more money for the better education of undergraduate students.
Secondly, almost all schools have similar education program, but in universities professors can hold some seminars and conferences to give additional lectures about the lessons to give some additional experience to children. It is obvious that for doing this, universities should pay additional salary to professors. For example, recent researches show that students who study at universities with greater amount of budget demonstrate greater creativity and perceptiveness, suggesting that funded money directly affect the brilliance of undergraduate students. They have more chance to represent the country in international platform and governments can organize some courses to grow up more talented students. Furthermore, with the help of seminars held by the help of money received by government students can gain experience to express themselves by pushing their limits for creativity. Hence, allocating money for universities for additional skill advancing courses, seminars, and conferences.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is extremely beneficial to fund some money on undergraduate students for development of the country.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. The invasion of the zebra mussel 76
- TPO 47 Writing IntegratedPterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 75
- TPO 36 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65229110512 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25734074708 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520215633423 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0145455899 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0625 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261791574901 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10434534455 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754308680618 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191294813387 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249980648262 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.