There is no shortage of debates determining the status of the behavior in a variety of conditions. Personally, I completely agree with the idea that clothes can have an effect on people’s traits. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
Initially granted, the convenience felt while wearing the usual clothes can influence behavior in a greater degree. It is clear that unusual or new clothes might have an impact on people’s mental behavior, causing them to trait different in these situations. For example, according to researches, it is not recommended to go to the exam or meeting for important things with new clothes because it made people feel inconvenient, and causes excitement, making negative consequences and traits because of the disturbance. In addition to this reason, clothes sometimes affect people in making crucial decisions, such as getting a job or making correct answers. Therefore, because of the impact of convenience while wearing usual clothes people can behave differently.
Another possible reason for this idea may be that self-esteem made while wearing clothes can be impactful on behavior of people. It is obvious that people try to express themselves with the help of the colors of clothes, such as multicolored, darkish, or white, and styles of these clothes, such as sportive, classic, and so other ones. My own experience is a good example for this reason. When I wear sportive and darkish clothes, I feel myself happy and behave kindly with everyone, depending on my clothes. Furthermore, styles and colors of the clothes can affect the behaviors of others to this person. Hence, because of the self-esteem made by the colors of the colors affect behaviors of people.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that clothes can have significant impact on their behaviors in different ways.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 47 Writing IntegratedPterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Sports and social activities are just important as classes and library should receive equal financial support. Agree or Disagree? 71
- TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended going', 'recommended gonna'.
Suggestion: recommended going; recommended gonna
...ple, according to researches, it is not recommended to go to the exam or meeting for important th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18811881188 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91070398956 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2068649231 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20177140514 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699682037591 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499680451277 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121800854554 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261538573543 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.