TPO 33
The issue of whether students learn more efficiently by doing the task within the group or alone aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if were asked would agree with the statement that when students are assigned to work on a project with some of their classmates, they can learn better, while others have a negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I postulate students benefit far outweigh by doing the task within a group. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is that this attitude creates a condition that student can learn from each other. Individuals have a distinct viewpoint toward different topics and concepts. When they work together they share their ideas and thoughts, therefore, this way assist to broad others horizon about the topic. For instance, when I was a college student our professor assigned us to write a report about the correlation between antioxidant and gestational diabetes, as nutrition science major by students from various majors, one of our group member was a biochemist and he was good at doing experiment, and one expert in researching, while I do not know anything about these subjects and during our work I learn a lot from them.
In approaching this issue apart from the reason given above, another reason that deserves some words is that this way leads to accomplishing the assignment sooner than a deadline, as in group work, usually, the tasks divide between members. As a result, students would have sufficient time to review their work and eliminate their mistakes. While if you were asked to carry out the project by yourselves since you have to dedicate most of your time to complete it, the result might not be satisfying because you have not enough time to revise and review your work.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that it is better for students to do their projects together, by this way they can advantage of learning from other members in a group. Moreover, they can do their tasks as soon as possible because they have to do a part of the project and their work would be precise as they have enough time to review their work.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has a greater influence on people s lives than television has 90
- TPO 8 – Task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the statement?Television advertising directed toward young children ( aged two to five) should not be allowed 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 86
- TPO 34 80
- TPO13 Q1 Integrated TOEFL Writing 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ome of their classmates, they can learn better, while others have a negative attitude ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ts, therefore, this way assist to broad others horizon about the topic. For instance, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...me to complete it, the result might not be satisfying because you have not enough time to rev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, apart from, for instance, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59632432489 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4925 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.7438034789 48.9658058833 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7692307692 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.