Different processes can be easily performed by technologies such as tablets and computers. They contain a wide range of programs for sohing questions, making calculations clearly and doing other processes, also robots do not need a lot of time for all this actions. Personally, I believe that although using devices from early years has disadvantages, knowing technical language gives a brighter future.
Electronical facilities provide a huge amount of both necessary unnecessary information, so it depends on every person. Moreover, it is obvious that a lot of people are addicted to social media while children can be addicted to video games if they use smartphones or tablets without control. In addition, due to the fact that they use the technology from an early age they will probably ship their childhood. For example, now approximately every children have own phones and they prefer to watch videos or play games than communicating with each other like in the past.
On the other hand, children’s usage of technology gives an opportunity to develop computer skills for a long time which will help in the future workplace. Technology duclops? day to day. So basic knowledge in programming language and dealing with lots of programs very well will provide a good chance to be in a high position. Furthermore, child will be noticed about all frends and changes that will encourage you for developing.
To conclude, usage of devices from an early age has both benefits and drawbacks. Moreover, everything depends on person, If individual understand how to use to get more benefit, he will try acting on that way, while it is only for fur, it will damage his childhood.
Therefore, I believe that when usage of devices under the control, child will have a great opportunity to be professional in the future.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? 89
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- TOEFL integrated writing: Dutch painter Rembrandt 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...obots do not need a lot of time for all this actions. Personally, I believe that alt...
^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Day
...e future workplace. Technology duclops? day to day. So basic knowledge in programmi...
^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...person, If individual understand how to use to get more benefit, he will try actin...
^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...son, If individual understand how to use to get more benefit, he will try acting ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11705685619 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93963381456 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7654300572 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191729851507 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606459103473 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476410309639 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103142385679 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355146991187 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.