Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Stating that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction, this view asserts that development of technology impedes making for a person a relationship with others. In some senses, it is true that more convenient our world becomes, the less communication between people is. In my point of view, however, considering that aspect of technology which can helping communicating in far distance and which can give information of people and in which can help us to find people easily, technology can be helpful to make good friends.
Of course, few would disagree that people are overly focusing on electronic machines rather than people who are in front of him/her or near them. When it comes to addiction to machines such as smart phone, TV, people cannot turn their sight to other thing including people. For example, when I was young there are many friends or unknown children at playground after school. Then I played with them whether I knew them or not. That was a kind of socialization or learning how to make relationship. However, in nowadays, children prefer playing computer games or doing smart phone rather than doing sports or playing with friends. This shows that development of technology could disturb our mind from having time with people.
However, can we always say that our life can be harmfully affected in our relationships? My answer is no. Considering that we can communicate with abroad people by e-mail or online messengers, it can be help to link us to other people all over the world. For example, one of my friends have e-mailed for few years with a friend who are American. Recently, he visited US and stayed his friend's house during few weeks and had a nice time. Next semester, the American friends plan to visit our country. This shows advantage of technology which can help experiencing other culture by making foreign friends.
Moreover, considering that, on internet website such as Google, Yahoo, Facebook, we can find people who share same hobby or friends who have not met for long time, chance to make new relationship or to recover forgotten relationship is given by technology in few clicks and little time. For example, when I was young, I moved to another city which is different from the city where I was born. For long time, I cannot have met friends of mine who lived the first city. Recently, I found their Facebook page by chance and I contacted them, I finally could meet them.
To summarize, many people would agree that in modern times, human interaction have been decreased because of machines. Considering that, however, the function of developed technology such as giving chance to communicate with people who live in the other side of the earth and find information of people who have not met for long time, only foolish people who can follow changing trend of making human interaction could asserts that our relations is restricted by machines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Siddiqur Rahman | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Caveira meyona | 94 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Adebisi01 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Adebisi01 | 83 | view |
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. 58
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substanda 89
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 70
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 66
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia—the scent of lavender flowers—has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where the 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to communicate' or 'communicate'.
Suggestion: to communicate; communicate
... aspect of technology which can helping communicating in far distance and which can give info...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 503, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
... information of people and in which can help us to find people easily, technology can be helpfu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ning how to make relationship. However, in nowadays, children prefer playing computer games...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to experience' or 'experience'.
Suggestion: to experience; experience
... advantage of technology which can help experiencing other culture by making foreign friends...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'assert'
Suggestion: assert
...trend of making human interaction could asserts that our relations is restricted by mac...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r relations is restricted by machines.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, kind of, of course, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 30.0 11.3162921348 265% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2471.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99191919192 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74690724977 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494949494949 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4493675692 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.434782609 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317296122369 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087340594312 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893179163105 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194077432346 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953303799101 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.