Nowadays, working plays a major role in people's lives and shows how successful they are, thus people always try to achieve the best they can. In order to achieve success, they need a scheme which points out the path to gain success. Some people prefer to do their job quickly and risk making some mistakes which known as a pace way to gain success; On the other hand, some people tend to work carefully with lots of concentration which leads them to be slowlier rather than the opposite group. In my perspective, being focused and accomplish tasks accurately has better effects and provides a more reasonable way to be successful by reasons which I provide below.
First and foremost, the correctness of your work's output demonstrates how skillful you are. Consequently, people who are more skillful have better job positions and could be known successful. To give it a perspective, l provide an example from what happened to my friend who was such a careful and focused person and always tried to do finish his works with least errors. Once he attended an interview for a well-known company in our home town, Isfahan, the interviewee figured out how accurate he was. In effect the interviewee took an account for his resume which was strong evidence that he did his tasks well with as few mistakes as possible; Thus, he got the position companioned by the high salary which is enough to know someone as successful.
Moreover, by doing tasks slowly and carefully we spend less time to correct possible problems and mistakes. Some people believe that working accurately needs more time rather than working fast and carelessly. In fact, they don't see the fact that although they spend less time to finish the job, they need much more time to recorrect the possible mistakes which are undeniable. Let's give it an example. My colleague used to work quickly and pay the least attention to the consequences of his work's output and always claimed he made his tasks by spending less time. Once he ran into a problem with his work which had delivered earlier and needed to fix it. As I remember, he spent several weeks to find the problem which wasn't clear for him, in addition, he spent more time to find a solution for that problem. He far passed the deadline and it leads getting him fire.
In a nutshell, it is obvious that working steadily and slowly has much more benefits to getting successful based on reasons provided before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...and always tried to do finish his works with least errors. Once he attended an interview f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...king fast and carelessly. In fact, they dont see the fact that although they spend l...
^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...possible mistakes which are undeniable. Lets give it an example. My colleague used t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...several weeks to find the problem which wasnt clear for him, in addition, he spent mo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, moreover, so, thus, well, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77014218009 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52515588725 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528436018957 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2295637865 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186435893958 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627298096693 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547954083374 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119476530792 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122082514955 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.