TOPIC: The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
The chart gives information about how 5 different sports attracted boys in 2 different aged groups at the school in the UK in 2010.
Overall, the percentage of 6-11 year-old boys was more active in most of these sports than 12-16 year-old group. In addition, 2 aged groups had the similar figure for swimming.
With regard to boys 6-11, there were 87% of boys who played football, which was twice than that for cricket, at 45%. Baseball was more popular with this aged group than rugby, with 35% and 23% respectively. The less common activity among boys 6-12 was swimming, with 19% of participants.
Looking the boys 12-16, the proportion of boys went swimming was 19%, which was similar to rugby, at 21%. But these figures still were lower than that for baseball, with 25%. There were 78% of 6-12 year-old boys who played football, 44% higher than the figure for cricket.
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 83
- Some people think companies should employ old people to work as they have a lot of working experience. Others, however, think it is better to recruit young people.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 61
- Some people think that it is better for students to learn local history than world history.Do you agree or disagree? 60
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, still, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33451608989 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4476105895 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261380747451 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120104069368 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137464497012 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210851880228 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167220242976 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.