TOPIC: The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
The chart gives information about how 5 different sports attracted boys in 2 different aged groups at the school in the UK in 2010.
Overall, the percentage of 6-11 year-old boys was more active in most of these sports than 12-16 year-old group. In addition, 2 aged groups had the similar figure for swimming.
With regard to boys 6-11, there were 87% of boys who played football, which was twice than that for cricket, at 45%. Baseball was more popular with this aged group than rugby, with 35% and 23% respectively. The less common activity among boys 6-12 was swimming, with 19% of participants.
Looking the boys 12-16, the proportion of boys went swimming was 19%, which was similar to rugby, at 21%. But these figures still were lower than that for baseball, with 25%. There were 78% of 6-12 year-old boys who played football, 44% higher than the figure for cricket.
- The table shows the number of employees and factories in the UK from 1851 to 1901. 84
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 61
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The line graph gives information about how much waste was produced by 3 companies from 2000 to 2005 33
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to make leather products Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, still, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33451608989 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4476105895 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261380747451 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120104069368 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137464497012 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210851880228 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167220242976 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.