The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different mode of transport.
The line graph illustrates the number of products being transported in Britain for the past 32 years, starting in 1974, by four various types of transportation. Units are measured in millions of tonnes.
Overall, the three types of transportation that were utilized had increased throughout the period, except rail that remains stable.
It is noticeable that roads widely used for transportation with roughly 70 million tonnes as compared to pipelines at around 10 million tonnes in 1974 respectively. Although roads experienced significant fluctuations over the years, the figures continued to move up hitting the highest point of almost a hundred million tonnes, whereas pipelines reached gradually just above 20 million tonnes in 2002 respectively.
Water transportation overtaken by rails at the beginning of the year,1974 with figures approximately 38 million tonnes and 40 respectively. After 8 years, water transportation went up modestly to around 58 million tonnes while rails rapidly declined and hitting its lowest point of about 24 million tonnes in 1996 and peaked to just above 40 million of tonnes in 2002.
- The charts show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1998 and 2000 67
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing ,and business and financial services -to the UK economy in the twentieth century. 84
- The chart shows the amount of waste production by British households since 1990 with predictions until 2030. 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000. 61
- The graphs below show the primary social networking of British users in 2010 and projected figures for 2018. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... starting in 1974, by four various types of transportation. Units are measured in...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pes of transportation that were utilized had increased throughout the period, exc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 1615.20841683 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 174.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51149425287 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10974775726 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 506.74238477 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1809839643 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142134991949 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759565277687 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538001192761 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099015432123 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367670730857 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.