The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the amount of air pollutants caused by three different factors in the UK between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, it is noticeable from the graph that there is a downward trend in the number of total pollutants and in two other causes, namely industry and households. At the same time, transport leading to air pollution remained steady throughout the period of 15 years.
Starting from 7 billion tonnes in 1990, the amount of total pollutants in the air then decreased gradually to 4 billion tonnes in 1999. This was followed by a period of slight dip, with the amount of total pollutants in the country declined to more than 3 million tonnes at the end of the period.
In the first year of the given period, industry accounted for 5.5 million tonnes. There was then a significant decrease to 3 million tonnes before falling to its lowest level at 2 million tonnes of pollutants in 2005. In contrast, both transport and household sources only generated much lower amount of air pollutants in the UK. Air pollution from transportation remained relatively constant at about 1 million tonnes from 1990 to 2005, whereas air pollutants from households saw a steady fall from 1 million tonnes in 1990 to approximately 0.1 million tonnes in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | JennieD | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | thuyduong896 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-10 | goodtime | 67 | view |
- Rate of unemployment in the UK 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 61
- Noise pollution in cities and rural areas 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram shows how Liverton docks change since 1980 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...illion tonnes at the end of the period. In the first year of the given period, i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proximately 0.1 million tonnes in 2005.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73983099438 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520930232558 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1199876314 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219560998834 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101179808893 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713604939976 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149821776015 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528957517553 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.