the pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to US between 1998 and 2000.
The table provides data on total value from 1988 to 2000 while pie chart provides information on fish sources imported to USA from different sources in the same period.
Overall it can be seen that value of total increased between 1988 and 2000, and percentage of imported fish from others and China also increased over the same period.
Looking at the table in more detail, it is evident that the amount of total value stood at 6.57 billions dollars in 1988 and this figure rose to 10.72 billions dollars in 2000.
Turning to the pie chart, it is clear that the percentage of fish which were imported to USA from Canada decreased form 60% in 1988 to 25% in 2000. In contrast, ratio of imported fish from Others and China was rised from 13% to 30% in 1988 and from 27% to 42% in 2000, respectively. In the 1992, the percentage of imported fish from Canada, China and others stood at 34 %, 20% and 46%, respectively.
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 % in the last ten years. Discuss causes and effects of this disturbing trend. 61
- the charts below give information about levels of education in glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010 73
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to US between 1998 and 2000. 67
- Some people think that the governments is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re imported to USA from Canada decreased form 60% in 1988 to 25% in 2000. In cont...
^^
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood at 34 %, 20% and 46%, respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5421686747 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32091359035 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481927710843 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.0607586652 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313916847614 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170810567873 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103086860223 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209323860549 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102149079985 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.