Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
In any field, science, art, literature, education critical and proper judgement is necessary to evaluate the work and its progress. Judgement plays a vital role not only in the judging the nature and appropriateness of current work but also in the flourisment process of the future work.
Let us start with defining the 'critical judgement' term. Critical judgement refers to the evaluation after considering each pros and cones, each positive and negative points, strength and weakness of every sub-part of the work. If any judgement which has done only at the surface level cannot be termed as critical and thus won't be able to reflect the complete evaluation of a work and its impacts.
For a critical judgement of a particular work, it is not necessary that it is done by an expertize of that field. In my perspective a person with adequate knowledge of that field, or have an experience of that kind and with efficient judgement abilities is able for the critical judgement. For critical judgement along with the ken of knowledge of that particular field, a person should have broader vision to judge every aspect like whether work's attributes, its impacts in present and future, its merits and demerits and many more.
Consider an example of judgement of production quality of certain company. It can be either done by an expertize of that kind of production or by a person who has enough knowledge of that production, its attributes and shortcomings. But for critical judgement it is also required to seek opinion of common man who are using the product of the company. They can help in getting the truth whether the quality is truely good as claimed by the company and its merits and demerits.
So it is not mandatory that critical judgement of a work can be done by a person who is expert in that field. It can be done by the person out of the field, but what is necessary to make the judgement valuable and effective is, judgement should be done after thoroughly inspecting all the elements of the work. The judgement should cover all the critics for the proper evaluation so that work can be further nourished or improved in the future if require.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-11-04 | AakashSharma | 54 | view |
2017-09-20 | gaoni | 62 | view |
2019-01-01 | udayrade1206 | 50 | view |
- The council of Maple Country, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 62
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 28
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 42
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 66
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 94
Sentence: In any field, science, art, literature, education critical and proper judgement is necessary to evaluate the work and its progress.
Description: A noun, singular, common is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to education and critical
Sentence: But for critical judgement it is also required to seek opinion of common man who are using the product of the company.
Description: The fragment common man who is not usually followed by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Sentence: The judgement should cover all the critics for the proper evaluation so that work can be further nourished or improved in the future if require.
Description: The fragment if require . is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace require with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Description: A conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to if and require
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 374 350
No. of Characters: 1755 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.398 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.693 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.662 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.933 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.929 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.467 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.406 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5