The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The author of the statement claim that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. Many of us will argue that it holds all the time and other will counter the claim br providing the examples. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
The method author suggested that praising positive actions and ignore negative ones can be a method to teach someone, but one can not firmly says that it is the best way to teach because ignoring negative action could lead to fatal result in the future. So teacher should praise the positive action as by praising student for doing will motivated them and others also do good things, but they should also try to stop or teach their student from wrong doing.
Secondly, why the suggested method can not be a good enough to teach becuase of the question that is who will decide what are positive actions and what are negative ones. Teacher right, but what if the teacher is not able to figure out what is positive actions and which should be catagories as negative ones. So, we can say that the method may be good for them who are to figure what are positive actions and what are negative ones, but for who don't know then they should follow another method of teaching.
Thridly, what if teacher tolerate or ignore screaming or fighting in class? At this point, when certain individuals disturb and worsen the learning effect for other students, the teacher has to interfere and make sure that such a behavior is not tolerated and leads to certain consequences, which are not in the interest of the individual, as they have to expect it in real life, too.
In nutshell, we can say that the teacher should praise the positive actions of student, so they can be stay positive and motivated to do good things, but the teacher has to interfere if a student is doing something wrong by councel or teaching him what he has done and how it can be affect him and others and make sure that such wrong thing should be not be repeated again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-29 | tester340 | 83 | view |
- as people rely more amnd more on technology to slove there problem , the ability of human to thing for themselve will surely deteriorate 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 50
- employees 68
- Formal education at every society has certain responsibility to rear students in a right way in order to become appropriate members of society. 58
- government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... provide sound reasoning for the same. The method author suggested that praisin...
^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he method author suggested that praising positive actions and ignore negative one...
^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'say'
Suggestion: say
...o teach someone, but one can not firmly says that it is the best way to teach becaus...
^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'motivate'
Suggestion: motivate
...n as by praising student for doing will motivated them and others also do good things, bu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., we can say that the method may be good for them who are to figure what are posi...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ons and what are negative ones, but for who dont know then they should follow anoth...
^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...and what are negative ones, but for who dont know then they should follow another me...
^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acher should praise the positive actions of student, so they can be stay positive...
^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and how it can be affect him and others and make sure that such wrong thing shou...
^^
Line 9, column 361, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeated'.
Suggestion: repeated
... that such wrong thing should be not be repeated again.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing should be not be repeated again.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56417112299 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25006791627 2.79657885939 80% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42513368984 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.32307412 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.181818182 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 23.4991977007 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386589129821 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191376486958 0.0831039109588 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224644675943 0.0758088955206 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218335301164 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14333548358 0.0667264976115 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.