Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
In this social world, working in a group is a common affair that people do in order to provide a better outcome. In this regard, some people might think that members of the group who follow groupthink are far way helpful than the members who believe in debating on decisions the other members make to do, and the others hold the opposite view. This author is with the latter idea due to two main reasons which will be demonstrated in the following essay.
To begin with, being on the idea of persisting to oppose with the majority’s way of thinking would lead into a conflicting situation in which every person would find the courage of defending their own opinion resulting in high efficiency of the final decision. In other words, when someone in the group opposes with decisions proceeding, she actually invites the other members into a challenging debate; as they realize an opinion is getting in the way of the dominant decision, they motivate to share their own belief because they think that it is the best chance to participate in the decision-making process and be an influence rather than obeying others’ perspectives. As a result, more useful ideas would make the unanimous decision much efficient. To illustrate, I have been working in a programming company for five years. Once, we had a very important meeting on a related project, which supposed to play a pivotal role in the success or failure of the company. Since everybody needed to be accurate about every idea he wanted to come up with, thus, the majority just did not give any opinion. The renowned members, however, shared their ideas. When the head assistant wanted to finalize the contract, one of the colleagues raised his hand and opposed to the decision had been made respectfully. At first, other members tried to convince him that it is the most effective decision, but, as the debate progressed, other participants changed their mind and tried to assert what they really thought. Finally, we changed the contract based on new and rational ideas. After a while, we realized that had not our friend persisted in his own view, we could have ended up in bankruptcy.
Furthermore, the intervention of a member in a group project would result in high productivity due to overlooking the potential problems. To clarify, working in teamwork somehow blinds the most group members’ eyes into consequences or possible problems of a consensus made by the majority. Critical thinking of a member, however, would alert others to either come up with a rational answer for so-called member, or be convinced that there is a problem, thereby resolving the plausible issues. Thus, by tackling down the probable problems, the productivity of the final decision would raise.
To sum up, when working together on a program, individuals who criticize the other members’ notions are far way helpful; they contribute into not only higher efficiency but also elevated productivity of the ultimate result of a project.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | neriman | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | 3063245467 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | as | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | mariem | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important that studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child 5 10 years old 1 Being helpful 2 Being honest 3 Being well organized 85
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child 5 10 years old 1 Being helpful 2 Being honest 3 Being well organized 63
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 95
- If you want to change one aspect to improve your health, which would you choose? Why?1.The kinds of food you eat2.The amount of the exercise you do3.The amount of the stress in your life 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this social world, working in a group...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e demonstrated in the following essay. To begin with, being on the idea of pers...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we could have ended up in bankruptcy. Furthermore, the intervention of a membe...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity of the final decision would raise. To sum up, when working together on a pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, really, so, thus, while, as a result, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00801603206 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82487091087 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541082164329 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4124424107 48.9658058833 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.526315789 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2631578947 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268410987724 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703366500114 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05837733448 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166682798254 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086691738763 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.