Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing
of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that
the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to
make as much money as possible
In the context of present-day world, where people and organizations are thriving towards a more sustainable world, the perception that a company's responsibility is to only make profits and that social welfare and caring about environment can be peripheral is too narrow.
Nowadays, the awareness about the socio-environmental concerns arising from an organisation's operation has increased. It is a well-accepted norm in today's world that the social and environmental concerns should be of prime importance to an organization. Majority of the organisations in today's world are moving towards more sustainable operations where a greater emphasis is placed on the environmental and social impact of the company and how it can thrive to make people's lives better. Therefore, having a narrow outlook, where a company thinks only about its profits would almost certainly prove to be counterproductive for the organization, even more when their competitors are moving towards more sustainable operations. This is because the consumer is well aware nowadays about a company's goals and would be reluctant to buy or invest in a company having such a narrow outlook which would ultimately hit their prime target of achieving higher profits.
Moreover, people's health and safety should be a paramount to any organisation aiming for sustainable growth. The healthier their employees and people around are, the more potential company unlocks for its growth. No organisation can grow by neglecting basic issue like healthcare, safety and quality. For example, since its inception the primary aim of TATA conglomerate has been safety and control on their environmental impact. These values have helped this organisation in becoming such a giant in today’s world. People would always prefer buying products or services from an organisation who painstakingly takes initiatives for socio-environmental betterment of its surroundings, consequently, this would ultimately lead to higher profits which is the goal for each organisation’s existence.
While it may seem lucrative to concentrate on earning more profits and ignoring other important social and environmental impacts, on the long term, this will only lead to the organisation's downfall. For sustainable growth of an organisation, it needs to establish such values in its operations. These values, along with helping people, ultimately helps the organisations in growing and sustaining that growth for longer time periods. In conclusion, it can be stated that, an organisation CANNOT grow by neglecting its duties of social welfare and environmental care. More focus on these values would eventually lead to more profitable and sustainable growth of the organisation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | orchid | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Ibrah111 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | aniketnichat | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | aniketnichat | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | psalasiya | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeingof the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe thatthe only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is tomake as muc 16
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 58
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerat 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisations'' or 'organisation's'?
Suggestion: organisations'; organisation's
...-environmental concerns arising from an organisations operation has increased. It is a well-a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisations'' or 'organisation's'?
Suggestion: organisations'; organisation's
...e long term, this will only lead to the organisations downfall. For sustainable growth of an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65365853659 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4039589227 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4225551828 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.352941176 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591187547803 0.243740707755 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215101093821 0.0831039109588 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228156364105 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474501792921 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268088007345 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 48.8420337079 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.