Four pie charts
The pie charts give information about the number of electrical units was produced by fuel sources in Australia and France at the time of 1980 and 2000.
It is clear from the charts that Coal was fuel sources that was used mostly in Australia to generate electricity in 1980, especially in 2000. Meanwhile, France government concentrated on developing nuclear power as the main way in the future to create electrical sources.
In Australia, the number of electrical units generated from natural gas decreased dramatically by 18 units in 2000. Have a similar trend, Oil only took the smallest percentage between the resources surveyed, this number was 10 units in 1998 and only 2 units over 2 years. By contrast, there was a rise up to 130 units of electrical energy that was created by coal. Meanwhile, Hydro power did not develop quickly in Australia because the evidence of it, there was a slight increase from 1998 to 2000.
It was more diverse resource in France. In 1998, except for Hydro power about 5 units, 4 other elements that generated electrical units were quite parity with each other. Over a period of 2 years, France witnessed a rapid growth of nuclear power and used it to produce approximately 126 units. On the same level, 25 units were the number of electrical energies from coal and oil, respectively. Both hydro power and natural gas decreased enormously to 2 units, reaching the lowest point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-16 | forever0828 | view | |
| 2019-08-23 | Thang Nguyen Duc | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 1980, especially in 2000. Meanwhile, France government concentrated on develo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88796680498 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67919370144 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539419087137 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9417014543 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0495118514263 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207887491218 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504950498979 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572811156751 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706454742756 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.