In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Nowadays, there have been major shifts within the structure of the families which affect their roles. In my opinion, these changes have brought about positive results.
Today, extended families have turned into nuclear ones as beginning couples, together with their children, decide to move out from the roof of their spouses’ parents. This is for them to assume greater responsibilities within the society. Moreover, individuals who are starting their own families desire to pursue greater opportunities outside due to the necessity of ensuring a higher quality of living condition. For instance, families are now migrating out of the country to move to Canada, the USA or Australia. To them, starting a new life in one of these nations provide substantial resources for their survival.
Furthermore, roles are now assumed by both parents as they now have the chance of subscribing to career opportunities to help them secure financial stability. Conversely, some of them are already assuming the roles of their partners when the need arises. Women empowerment have played a big role in this major change which is far different from the situation in the earlier days when female population are forbidden to do tasks which were intended for men. Now, the husband can take over the role of the wife in looking after their children and their needs while taking care of the entire household.
These advancements have been beneficial since they become more exposed to the constant demands of modernization. This helps them be adaptive to the different lifestyles and cultures which they have not encountered before. Moreover, these can promote awareness to the parents and their offspring as they become aware of the challenges as beginning families. It does not only provide them a secured future as an intact family, it can also help be imprinted in their children’s minds as they begin to acquire values formation which they can use when they begin a family of their own.
By and large, most nuclear families move out to look for bigger opportunities which affects their roles in the society. However, these effects connote positive outcomes as a unit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | munawwer | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Ibknaanii | 56 | view |
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 81
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 73
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for instance, by and large, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19943019943 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76645365069 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558404558405 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2988636479 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.352941176 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123547343428 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481320900286 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04799016275 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956931655564 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698254273157 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.