Do you agree or disagrees with the following statement?
it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
In this era of unemployment, people do try to attain many masters degrees as possible. is it due to the lack or experience or educational qualification that the people do not have jobs?. A real question yet to answer. Consequently, many believe that having sound knowledge in numerous subjects will be beneficial for them in future. I however, strongly oppose this and is convinced that having expertise in one specific area is the best choice due to the following reasons.
Firstly, focussing on a single field of study is easy and less time consuming. For instance, if a student is interested to become a software engineer, he can earn a bachelor's degree in computer science. The degree that he earns will enable him to procure an internship in a well reputed company which eventually will help in his future career progress. Likewise, he can concentrate on his area of engineering during his whole academic year without any unnecessary distraction. Hence, it is better to learn one degree at a time.
Secondly, human mind cannot absorb a lot of information at a time. If a person try to learn a variety of subjects, he will not be able to concentrate on any of them. For example, a doctor needs to have a medical degree simultaneously if he attains literature and computer science degrees together it might not be useful for him. Additionally, it would be a waste of time, money and resources. Nevertheless, to say he will not be an expert in his field of study. Therefore, I would suggest that it is always better to have a degree that interests you instead of gaining many degrees.
To reiterate, it is always better to earn a degree rather than learning more than one subjects since it will be burdensome for the student in his life. It would be difficult for him to focus on which field of study to go further in his career life too. Moreover, it will be an expensive and time consuming process.
- TPO41 80
- tpo40 70
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. 60
- Do you agree or disagrees with the following statement?it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 60
- tpo-42-Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
...ttain many masters degrees as possible. is it due to the lack or experience or edu...
^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...us subjects will be beneficial for them in future. I however, strongly oppose this and is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is career life too. Moreover, it will be an expensive and time consuming process....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75223880597 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86818919265 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525373134328 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3903886735 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7894736842 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153813062395 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476156093197 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619951801127 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102444006105 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706451968697 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.