do you agree or disagree with this statement:
Nowadays act of having meals together with family members is not important anymore.
Undoubtedly, with the advances of the modern world, most traditional old customs have been forgotten. In this vein, eating with family members is no exception. While some people hold the view that people need to have regularly family meals together, I strongly believe it is not important. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, today, the majority of family members have to work for better lives, and therefore had not the time, and cannot eating food with their family members. On other words, they have a different schedule, and they cannot eat together, and otherwise, they are at risk of losing their jobs. My family experience is a good example for this, I remember, when I was high school student, At that time, my parents worked, my mother worked in the hospital, and my father was a pilot, when I came home from school, I ate food alone. On the other hand, despite all these hardships, it can be said that my family has sacrificed to make life better. Thus, the need to work for a better life has led to a decrease in eating with family members together.
Second, nowadays, there are diverse diets for various people, including patients, athletes, and vegetarian, that this situation does not allow eating with family members together. On the other hand, they cannot cook food for anyone with a separate diet because it is difficult. My experience is a good example for this, I am a vegan bodybuilder, and my diet is different schedule because I eat six meals a day and this is more difficult in the race conditions so I cannot be following family meal schedules. If I eat according to my diet and family schedule, I cannot progress in my sport. Hence, it can be said that today's family members have different dietary styles that cannot eat meals together.
In conclusion, while there are arguments to be made for both sides of the issue, it is clear that modern social situation not allow other to have regularly family meals together because most of all people have to work for progress life, and because there are different dietary styles that lead to that they cannot eat meals together
- do you agree or disagree with this statement:Nowadays act of having meals together with family members is not important anymore. 63
- Your are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group. Do you think a person's honesty is the most important characteristic for being a leader? 60
- If your teacher says something incorrect in a class, what will you do?1）Interrupt your teacher right away;2）keep silent;3）correct your teacher after class. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People living in small villages are more satisfied with their life than those who living in the cities 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement While parents have the responsibility to educate young people about healthy eating habits schools should also be responsible for this 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...in my sport. Hence, it can be said that todays family members have different dietary s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77479892761 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52802645978 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455764075067 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8489155567 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.733333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228306023961 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100610236161 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679591271697 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167496064317 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373611944813 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.