As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
This topic is saying that having more knowledge is not comprehensible but more complex and mysterious. No doubt knowing more than required might sometimes lead to complexity. Nevertheless, if that knowledge is used efficiently then it won’t lead to any kind of complexity. Thus, I disagree with the opinion that if we acquire more knowledge then things will not be comprehensible but complex and would argue that efficient use of knowledge will always lead things to be comprehensible.
Firstly, as we all know the well-known saying that goes “Knowledge is power” and “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing”. We know that without proper knowledge life is miserable.
The power of knowledge is so much that it can save you from any circumstances of life.
Consider an example if anyone is going on a trip. It is very much essential to know the maximum about the place and its culture. In such circumstances, even if the person has more information that might not be of any use to him in his trip, he can use that to guide other people along his path if needed. Consequently, the person will be happy to help, and things won’t get mysterious or complex rather beneficial.
Furthermore, the complexity of the problem depends upon how we tackle it. Having enough knowledge can also lead to complexity if not used correctly. For example, if a person is having all the information but he is not aware of its proper arrangement then it might end up making things complex or mysterious. Undoubtedly, only due to such situations, the author’s view cannot be accepted.
In conclusion, the author’s view is unpersuasive as it stands. The author should put his point more evidently to make the context clearer and more acceptable. Finally, to get a better understanding of this context we need to know more about the situations that make things complex and mysterious due to excess knowledge rather than making them comprehensible.
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favourite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 55
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 58
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- Government should invest as much as in arts as in military. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...inion that if we acquire more knowledge then things will not be comprehensible but c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ays lead things to be comprehensible. Firstly, as we all know the well-known s...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terious or complex rather beneficial. Furthermore, the complexity of the probl...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uthor's view cannot be accepted. In conclusion, the author's view is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09538461538 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15879686481 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495384615385 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9268024707 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290870041616 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933097087312 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107050172506 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141492417679 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11706076029 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.