Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
It is safe to say that for most things in life, for something that is short and sweet rather than long and drawn out is a much more pleasant experience. The claim that those in positions of power, regardless of the field, should step down after five years has sound reasoning, in regards to that new leadership can bring innovative ideas to the field. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this claim and the reasoning behind it. Those in positions of power should step down after five years, to make room for new leaders and subsequent further success in those fields. This essay will delve into two reasons why this claim and reasoning is of solid ground.
To begin, those who are in any job or position for too long are susceptible to the very real effects of burn out. As those positions that are most powerful are most often the positions that are most stressful, this stress could have an effect on even the most even-handed people. For example, the President of the United States is, by law, only allowed as President for eight years, and this only happens if a second term is won after four years in office. This law ensures that someone who is making calm, rational decisions at the beginning of their time in power does not slowly give in to their stress and the onions of others, and make rash and harmful decisions as time goes on. The stress a President has each day, could only possibly be managed for a certain amount of time, before they either intentionally or unintentionally let their burnout start making the decisions for them.
Further, any field needs reinvigoration every so often with new people, ideas and innovation. If the same people in a field are in power for long periods of time, it is less likely that the field will demonstrate growth and the evolution necessary to keep the field relevant and afloat. For example, if a Principal is in the same school for a long period of time, they could be stuck to their same ways and opinions, and not allow the ever-changing times to influence any of their decisions. However, if every five years or so a new Principal took charge of the school, it would be like a breath of fresh air, compared to the same old recycled, stale air blowing through the halls. New people lead’s to new ideas, personalities, and excitement.
Some might argue that those in positions of power are the most knowledgeable in their field and should therefore not be forced to resign after so many years. Although this is a valid point, it should be noted that time and experience is not the only indicator of knowledge. In fact, those who are in positions of power might be less trained or aware of any new laws, or regulations in their field, compared to those who have been preparing to take over for a while.
In conclusion, those who are in a position of power should step down after five years in order to not let the effects of burnout influence their decisions, as well as to let some new “blood” into the field that could lead to innovation and creative ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...n after five years has sound reasoning, in regards to that new leadership can bring innovativ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ncipal is in the same school for a long period of time, they could be stuck to their same ways...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62799263352 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53099517938 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454880294659 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3906317324 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.263157895 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5789473684 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318252027501 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10783385397 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864363096243 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19413852102 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855288522272 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.