Nowadays use of mobiles particularly smart phones are increasingly prevalent. Most of the daily routines are done by mobiles in developing and developed countries so the detrimental effects of the device is appearing and the number of opposition groups are carrying on their activities again this state of the art appliance. In the following I will evaluate both sides of the view.
On the one hand, the constructive effects of smart phone are undeniable. If one consider wide ranges of capability of mobiles, can find out that it is the best choice to replace by personal computer. In addition it makes the global more achievable by a myriad of abilities which have provided, namely video chat, text massage, voice massage, all kind of social media, and so on. Therefore, it has made our living more comfortable and convenient, regarding the time.
On the other hand, scientists unveil the number of demerits of applying this technology. Exposing in the mobile rays not only due to physical influences, such as itchy eye, in some cases be hard of hearing, etc, but also cause to insurmountable amount of mental diseases for instance, depression. Mobiles innovation, combination with hectic life style, lead to less communication in a factual situation. In my opinion it is the most distinguished weakness point of smart phone.
In the way of conclusion, I reaffirm my view that the benefits of mobile phones are by far out weight of its drawbacks and also entirely believe that in the near future the physical effect of mobile phones will be made up.
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 11
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from bluesky university in 2006 entiring different employment sectors. 61
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumer.To what extent do you agree of disagree with this opinion. 56
- Should cigarettes and other tobacco products be outlawed? 80
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...o the detrimental effects of the device is appearing and the number of opposition groups are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...carrying on their activities again this state of the art appliance. In the following I will eval...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ice to replace by personal computer. In addition it makes the global more achievable by ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
... have provided, namely video chat, text massage, voice massage, all kind of social medi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffect of mobile phones will be made up.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99615384615 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88799545558 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0955775039 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139266948043 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402462998743 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395996054978 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802360561583 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032452451607 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.