The first question;
1. Should a nation require all of her students to take up the same national curriculum until they enter college? Agree or disagree
A nation, on a normal ground, should know what her needs are and work towards it. Well revised curriculum will actually project a nation towards her target goals. Therefore, I agree with the author that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national currriculum until they enter college.
To start with, a well planned national curriculum helps all the students to embrace the key subjects the country has considered important. There are many students that may not want take up key subjects like Mathematics for study. This is owing to the difficulty many encounter with this subject. Therefore, many would want to avoid such difficulty and continue with their choice of subjects devoid of Mathematics like English, Government, et cetera. This is inapposite as Mathematics is of mundane importance.
Also, national curriculum helps in building students passion towards indegenous language. Many students would want to avoid studying of the languages as they complain of difficulty in understanding the study of such language especially in writing. When a nation has made it a thing of importance, that is the only time students will take such language serious.
Moreover, this national curriculum helps the nation channel their resouces towards the target area of development by engendering more manpowers. The nation knows the courses they need more students to study. They can make such course a prerequisite. The more students get to know about such course, the more they like and take it up for future study.
In conclusion, a country should develop a good national curriculum with regards to her target goals. With this, more specific development related needs of the country will be addressed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | Isioma Nwayor | 50 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The reading discusses three reasons to believe it is because of pollution that here has been a decline of sea otters off of alaska and california, while the lecture discusses why predation, especially by orcas, is a better explanation of the evidence pres 80
- The reading discusses three reasons to believe that a small mammal, R. robustus, could not have been an active hunter (perhaps it was scavenger that sometimes fed on unhatched eggs of psitticosaur dinosaur), but lecturer presents reasons why each of these 66
- The reading discusses three bad effects of people reading less literature than they used to. the lecture shows why these effects are not so bad or are caused by something other than people choosing not to read so much literature. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun encounter seems to be countable; consider using: 'many encounters'.
Suggestion: many encounters
... study. This is owing to the difficulty many encounter with this subject. Therefore, many woul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
..., national curriculum helps in building students passion towards indegenous language. Ma...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 278.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23021582734 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75254844722 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496402877698 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1086302347 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5294117647 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359144982334 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12353924982 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109972234298 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2079951609 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121175361113 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.