Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The quality of education in the universities has a significant effect on not only the life of the students but also on the prospect of a nation. A better quality education can equip a country with large number of capable and skilled individuals who can make contributuion to the different fields of that country. Now, to improve quality of education requires improving a number of areas. The teachers plays an important role in a quality education, but they are not the only factor. Thus, I disagree with the statement here that the spending more money on the salaries of the university professors will improve the quality of the education.
To begin with, in higher studies, the infrastructures of the universities play a very important role. University education is considered as the epitome of studies. It is not bound by books or the lectures provided by the teachers in the classroom. The students also need hands on experience to relate the knowledge of the book with the real life. Thus, having appropriate lab facilitites along with other resources like, well developed library is also very importatnt in ensuring a quality education. For instance, one of my friend, who is a teacher of a new engineering university, told me the campus situation of his work place. For reference, he is one of the most brightest mind I have ever seen and is a very good teacher. He said that the university lacks in essential lab facilities and the condition is such that he has to conduct lab class in traditional class settings without any equipments. Now, If the students don't do any experiments, how they are going to learn and apply this knowledge in the real life? Even if the university provides my friend with more salary, that is not going to have any effect on the quality of education as the university lacks in the most basic requirements. Thus, in my opinion it is rather wise to spend money for the infrastructure of the universities to provide quality education.
Furthermore, another indication of a better university with a quality education is the research capability of the university. It also has an undeniable effect on the future prospect of the students in getting jobs. In general, any research requires a substantial amount of money. This researchs bring out the best from the students as they have to work in the undiscovered fields of science. Not only that, having a good research potential attracts many investors and employers to invest in the university, which in turn can enable the university to spend more in research works. Thus, investing more in the field in the research can have a far reaching impact in improving the quality of the education. In addition, more research fund can facilitate the university to retain high profile experienced teachers by paying them handsome remuneration. For example, my friend, who completed his graduation from an ivy league university was hired just after his graduation considering his reasearch potential and ability, even though his GPA was low. This is how focusing money on research can help in improving the quality of education and employement possibility of the graduates too.
In conclusion, I strongly stand by my position that, spending more money on the salaries of the teachers does not ensure improving the quality of the education. Rather spending more money on the infrastructures and reasearch facilities of the universities can result in higher quality education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- TOEFL TPO 43 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 35
- TPO- test30- burning mirror 60
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 77
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'play'.
Suggestion: play
...proving a number of areas. The teachers plays an important role in a quality educatio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'brightest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: brightest
... place. For reference, he is one of the most brightest mind I have ever seen and is a very goo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the brightest'.
Suggestion: most the brightest
... place. For reference, he is one of the most brightest mind I have ever seen and is a very goo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 925, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ut any equipments. Now, If the students dont do any experiments, how they are going ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...improving the quality of the education. Rather spending more money on the infrastructu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 52.1666666667 176% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2889.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 574.0 407.700716846 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0331010453 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98632138789 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425087108014 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 938.7 618.680645161 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9486723655 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2592592593 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40740740741 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297389879463 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949297137445 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914726906702 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223646694249 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551973380556 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.