Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence requires extra time and system capacity and hence, Company management should eschew from doing such monitoring.
A company consists of its employee and management team. While it is the duty of the employee to do the job for which they were appointed, the management team looks over the overall work performance of the employee. In this modern era e-mail is a popular medium of sending official letter or any kind of documents from one person to another. Likewise, in this modern era every company requires its employee to send and receive e-mail. However, it may happen that apart from the particular job an employee has some other jobs to do which requires e-mailing. But this should not be a problem for the company if the output from the employee is satisfactory. So, there is no point to monitor the e-mail correspondence as it can cause serious harm to the overall performance of the company. For example, in a company of tens of thousands of employee, in order to monitor all employee e-mail the particular company should appoint some personal which requires extra cost. If the company can ensure that the output from the employee is satisfactory then there is no need for monitoring email correspondence of employee. Output from employee, however, can cause from other facts and if the company only concentrate on the email correspondence then the actual fact will be overlooked which will hurt the company.
A person has his own privacy and company should not go after it. For example, an employee is maintaining his other business work while doing the job and the business work requires some secret document to be sent or received daily by the employee. So, in this case if the company monitor his e-mail then the personal information of the employee will be at risk.
However, it is true that company gives money to the employee for doing job for the company in the working hour and employee should not do other private job in this time and for this the company can appoint some personal to monitor the email correspondence. But before doing this they must warn the employee about this fact.
A company should not monitor email correspondence of employee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 79
- In a recent survey of college graduates 90 percent agreed that participating in an internship increased their chances of finding a job after graduation but last year only 40 percent of Linford s graduating art students had completed an internship Skyway D 67
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well 70
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains 77
- ssdsd 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity and hence, Company management should eschew from doing such monitoring. A c...
^^
Line 3, column 1243, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...te on the email correspondence then the actual fact will be overlooked which will hurt the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, while, apart from, for example, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91777188329 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70871248337 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395225464191 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4504265361 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.058823529 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335514487154 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142454700243 0.0831039109588 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103260567728 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250156587195 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105780724177 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.