People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The statement implies that people who decide their course of works based on emotion and then justify their deeds with logic are poor decision maker. Though it is desirable that people should think before taking their decision, I don't completely agree with the fact that people who plans to work based on emotion are always poor decision makers. In fact, it's a too generalize idea.
A universal belief about how decision should be taken is reflected in the presented issue task. There is a saying that "Think before you do". Human tends to believe that if someone thinks and plans first before doing any task, the task is meant to be successfully completed. So, those who decide not to conform by the universal beliefs, the iconoclasts or the mavericks, often take decisions that is impossible to justify in the first place. According to the statement, these people are poor decision makers and meant to be a failure consequently.
However, history suggests that all the people who followed their heart instead of brain always are not always poor decision makers at all. In fact, some intriguing success stories we admire now, started just because of the whimsical decisions of some legends of the world history. Bill Gates can be mentioned as an example. A Harvard student, who could easily go with the flow, graduate from there and land a great job with a salary admirable to all. But, unlike most of the people, he decided to follow his heart. He dropped out from mighty Harvard, started his new computer company, which was not even popular in those days, and we all know him as an examplar in tech industry now. When decided to quit Harvard and start a new company, it was not justifiable at all. But his success talked on behalf of him. If he thought logically at that time like most of the people and stuck with college, we might not have either Bill Gates or such an advanced computer system. His intrepidity to follow his heart lead to his success. There are many cases like this around us like Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook or Steve Jobs of Apple. This kind of inspiration can be found in other sectors too. Like people leaving engineering/ medical college built successful career in the fields of arts like paining, photography, music etc.
Moreover, it is noe believed that just following logic can't ensure success. If anyone is not satisfied with what he or she is doing, it is very unlikely for him or her to have success even if he or she goes with the flow, think logically like people around them. Actually, well planning and logical thinking also don't guarantee success. A lot of well planned start-ups or scientific projects failed measurably. On the other hand, a lot of whimsical decisions are being taken all over the world which also turns to dust very quickly.
Finally, just like all the decisions carefully taken by brainstorming or logical discussion are not good decisions, the decisions which seems to be capricious are not all bad. There is success and failure in both scenario. So the statement is too narrow and generalized to judge people and their ability of taking decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 55
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily newspaper."Throughout the country last year, as more and more children below the age of nine participatedin youth-league sports, over 40,000 of these young players suffered injur 72
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown:“If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighboring town, Hayesworth, passed 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d think before taking their decision, I dont completely agree with the fact that peo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...aking their decision, I dont completely agree with the fact that people who plans to work based on emoti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e always poor decision makers. In fact, its a too generalize idea. A universal...
^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to generalize'?
Suggestion: to generalize
...ys poor decision makers. In fact, its a too generalize idea. A universal belief about how...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 56, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... noe believed that just following logic cant ensure success. If anyone is not satisf...
^^^^
Line 13, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...well planning and logical thinking also dont guarantee success. A lot of well planne...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, in fact, kind of, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2600.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8417132216 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49277362771 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51582867784 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4220055584 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6551724138 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5172413793 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327209611853 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773111867925 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101871754065 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209702539201 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108438740992 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.