Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
It is said that facts related to different subjects should not be trusted because it may be proved that they are not true in the future. people should mistrust any piece of information, just because it might be incorrect in the future. I disagree with this point of view.
Facts are those that help us in the exploration of the world. Knowing about this world is impossible without these facts. Facts might be proven to be incorrect in the future but in their own time, they should be accepted because they are passed from many tests to be considered as a fact. There is no way of rejecting facts in a short time. Therefore, based on the needs, facts will change. However, in the present time, facts should be assumed correct, otherwise, the world will not move on. Most of the facts are a result of researches done by researchers. Because scientists go through the hard work to establish facts, the facts cannot be completely denied. In addition to this, researches are done to provide a new phenomenon to the world. They do not need to be correct all the time. Most of them can meet the needs of people at the desired time. I believe that the facts presented by researchers should be accepted until convincing evidence is provided to reject them. This is because the facts are analyzed by eminent professors. Facts carry a lot of meanings and are useful for the world. For example, Pluto was considered as an alternative planet for a living for many years. This subject was a fact for many years until recently scientists found that Pluto did not have the necessary criteria for living, and now Mars is considered as a second planet and is under the supervision of researchers.
We have to consider that researchers always try to present right facts. However, they are also human and they may make mistakes. Because of this, the different theories are checked by various researchers and experts, and they are either developed or rejected. Expert people also may make errors because of different reasons such as lack enough knowledge or facilities. Additionally, if we want to consider facts always wrong, we will not be able to have innovation. For example, if we consider the Pythagorean theorem incorrect or if we assume the invention of pi in math is baseless, we cannot do any deep researches in math. Therefore, for progress in the future, we have to consider many facts true at present.
Sometimes the theory of scientists at present to be considered wrong but in the future, the others find it correct. For instance, the theory of Galileo that the Earth is round and rotates around the sun. In the time of Galileo, this theory seemed to be incorrect but, in the future, it was proven that Galileo’s theory was correct and helped to many types of research.
To summarize, in my view facts should be considered true in their own time until it is proved that they are incorrect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gauravwazza12 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Kutumba kasyap | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | macropinna | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Roshan Dhakal | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | AAAA2222 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 33
- In some countries, young people at the age of 18 are considered adults and can drive a car, vote and get married, while other countries don't allow it. What age do you think is the best to be considered an adult? 84
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus, the number of 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...d that they are not true in the future. people should mistrust any piece of informatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 19.5258426966 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73320158103 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62382426025 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440711462451 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7452921384 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8333333333 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245401878816 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734125295533 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792757723023 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165115129149 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792092827211 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.