underground railway systems
The table provides obviously the statistic about the underground railway systems in six discrepancy countries in the world.
It is clear from the table that London set up their underground railway system earliest in 1863 and their kilometers of the route was also by far longer than the rest. Meanwhile, even though the length of route of Tokyo was not too long, but they possessed the number of passengers in a year was largest and outweighed the different countries in the survey.
London used the underground railway system in 1863 but at the time, only had about 775 million people who were the annual clients. In 1990, Paris set up the first new with nearly 200 kilometer distance and occupied the second position about the number of passengers with over 1190 people per year. There were approximately 1927 people aboard the underground train per year at Tokyo, in spite of the fact that it was only 155 kilometers, less than two countries above.
On the average, Washington constructed this system in 1976 with about 126 kilometers and having 144 million annual passengers. By contrast, the locations in which constructed the latest were Kyoto and Los Angeles, the systems still were not invested much enough as a result of only 45 million and 50 million passengers per year, respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, while, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95871559633 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63530014124 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.5243243168 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.125 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285886854404 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145208263839 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138567875134 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206736414368 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106279773338 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.