In the modern era, the news is regarded as a key factor contributing to the awareness of the society. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the sufficiency of the information in a single magazine. Although many people might find it convenient to use just one source of knowledge, I strongly believe, reaching enough information requires reading as many reports as possible. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, all news sources cover the events based on their own favors. Newspapers have their own sponsors and these people can contribute to the main principles and policies of the organization. For example, I read an article that highly recommended the electric cars by stressing their environmental-friendly features supporting with plenty of convincing reasons and facts. After a while, I encountered another essay that talked about the dangers of using these vehicles. It also mentioned the earlier essay and revealed that one of its financial proponents was the Tesla company which is a great manufacturer of electric automobiles. As a result, they didn’t cover all the facets and effects of using hybrid cars on nature, thus their conclusion should not be fully trusted.
Secondly, a newspaper is not professional in all aspects. In some cases, we use the information inside the newspapers to prepare ourselves for making big decisions like investing money, traveling, migration, etc. Though, we can not make clear judgments without taking related matters into account. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I’m going to apply for studying abroad and I’m in the process of finding suitable countries to live and study. Having a limited budget for the application fees of the universities, I have to narrow my choices. I try to follow the local news of each place to classify my options. For example, as the local news of USA says this country has plenty of job opportunities and also great academic potential. However, the political disagreements between Iran and the USA is a huge disadvantage for me; because I may not be allowed to come back to my homeland in the future. Consequently, I crossed it off my list.
In conclusion, I’m of the opinion that we have to consider utilizing various sources to reach a great deal of information. It’s because assorted newspapers cover the news from their own point of views and policies, and it helps us to link a variety of news together to perceive different aspects of situations.
- some people believe that video games could inspire young student's interests and make their study more efficient rather than distracting them and the waste of time so young student should be allowed to play video games 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06398104265 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01991789461 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575829383886 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4860336656 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1363636364 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127887654928 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326545946736 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301665464222 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792362952686 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286741247175 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.