The government is responsible for protecting a nation’s cultural identity. Thus, some people believe new buildings should be built in traditional styles.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, it is a global concern that every old things are and new modern design and style are invented. However, some argued that new monuments ought to be built in traditional style and responsibility for maintaining a country's cultural identity is of government. Personally, I strongly agree with this opinion and I shall highlight my views in the following essay.
To begin with, in this burgeoning population everyone choices varies where some like old culture and some like new ideas with tradition. Firstly, with protecting cultural identity children's would know about nation religions and protocols. To illustrate with, a taj mahal which is situated in agra, india which is built by shah jahan is a marvelous building for commuters to visit and know about old culture. As a result, much international tourism should augment and also this will affect on country's revenue as well. Not only bureaucrats but also public are responsible for protecting cultural identity because law enforcement agency not do all such things as they have to contribute to the research and other certain programmes indeed.
Additionally, although this is contemporary era more people are fascinated towards new modern life style invention but no place can replace the cultural and traditional style. For instance, there are plethora of statues are built nowadays in tribute to those legends so in that manner new monuments should be built. Moreover, peoples are eager to know about various traditional design and consequently, this change will attract them.
To conclude, the government is not only responsible for maintaining cultural and traditional buildings but country's pupils also have to do contribution; therefore, I believe improvement should be inevitable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | suraj1471998 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | suraj1471998 | 78 | view |
- Do you agree or that improvements in technology reduce the role of olympic games 72
- Grandparents take care of children when their parents are out at work. 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The government is responsible for protecting a nation’s cultural identity. Thus, some people believe new buildings should be built in traditional styles.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists rather than local people.Why is this?What can be done to encourage local people to visit museums and historical sites?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun tourism seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much international tourism', 'a good deal of international tourism'.
Suggestion: much international tourism; a good deal of international tourism
...nd know about old culture. As a result, many international tourism should augment and also this will effec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...urism should augment and also this will effect on countrys revenue as well. Not only b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42909090909 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94163613326 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.331567757 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378326777976 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12519218536 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631370416495 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227063522968 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204531655861 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.