The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989.
Given is a chart illustrates how much average house prices changed in 5 separate countries in 1990-2002 compared to 1989.
There was a significant decrease in average house prices in New York, Tokyo and London in 1990-1995, While average house prices declined by 5 per cent in New York, that figure in Tokyo and London was the same, at approximately 7.5 per cent. Meanwhile, Marid and Frankurt saw a slight increase in house prices, at about 3 and 4 per cent respectively.
On the contrary, there was an opposite trend from 1996 to 2002. It is also interesting to note that Apart from Tokyo, average house prices in the rest of cities climbed compared to 1989. London saw by far the most dramatic acceleration in house price, at over 10 per cent. When it came to second, it was Newyork with 10 per cent. There was a modest increase in house prices in Marid and Frankurt compared to 1989.
Overall, apart from Frankurt, house prices in other cities rose from 1990 to 2002, particularly Newyork and London. Although house prices in Japan still leveled off in 1996-2002 compared to 1989, they went up slightly compared to 1990-1995.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-09 | cocococo123 | 78 | view |
2015-06-23 | roxanaluca | 80 | view |
2014-04-21 | Lê Kim Kiều Anh | 95 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricutural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 80
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss and give your opinion. 77
- Nowadays fami problem? 90
- It is genarally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are or musician.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 80
- Please comment on the applicant, including asheets or supplementary documents for reference may be attached on behalf of the applicant. 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 197 200
No. of Characters: 906 1000
No. of Different Words: 99 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.746 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.599 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.506 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 59 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.479 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.521 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.757 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.122 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4