The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989.
The bar chart illustrates the varying proportion of residence values in new york, madrid, tokyo, frankfurt and london compared between 1989 and a group from 1990 to 2002.
it can be clearly seen that the proportion change was tended to decrease during 1990 and 1995 whereas it was usually an increase after 1996. Overall, the value basis of house was significantly raised.
Between 1990 and 1995, The largest positive change was recorded in frankfurt at 2%, madrid was followed by 1%. The proportion variation of other countries was all decreased, 5% in new york, the highest negative changes were tokyo and london, where shifted at 8%.
There is a dramatically increase started from 1996. The biggest change was occurred in london sharply by 20% to 12%, the second-high was new york rose by 10% of positive change powerfully, madrid also raised softly to 4%, frankfurt kept positively at 1% while it was fell lightly. The only case of negative variation was tokyo at 5% despite it was increased by 3% comparted with the previous period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | cocococo123 | 78 | view |
| 2015-06-23 | roxanaluca | 80 | view |
| 2014-04-21 | Lê Kim Kiều Anh | 95 | view |
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- Every year several languages die out. This is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...en 1989 and a group from 1990 to 2002. it can be clearly seen that the proportion...
^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... london, where shifted at 8%. There is a dramatically increase started from 1996. The biggest change w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61393440262 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617142857143 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2561920429 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127728986869 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635641703669 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573967269948 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983763278773 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583412896418 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.