The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.
The depicted bar graph enumerates the comparative data about the most common sports played in the context of New Zealand in 2002.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of both sexes seem to have participated in Swimming whereas, the least ratio of male and female had participated in Athletics over a given period.
To initiate, the highest percentage of the male seems to engage in playing soccer in 2002 at exactly a quarter ratio. Moreover, a tiny proportion of male had played Netball throughout the year 2002, which obviously the lowest trend.
On the contrary, in terms of girls roughly one-quarter proportion of females seem to play the Netball which makes up the largest portion in 2002. Furthermore, around one percent of females seem to play Cricket which represents the lowest trend in 2002. Surprisingly, a marginal difference is seen on the basketball and tennis at 2 percent and 1 percent, simultaneously.
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 61
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 56
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14379084967 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89578628293 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62091503268 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2060893194 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218732123164 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109470973487 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135737249882 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156406559812 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162978789159 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.