Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely held belief that environmental pollution is the responsibility of the government. On contrary, we have some environment specialists claiming that it is collective responsibility of both citizens and government bodies. Considering this as very important topic and needs a detailed discussion covering intricate aspects circulating around it.
Generally, it is understood that taking right actions, building policies, coming up with campaigns for awareness and allocating funds for eradicating pollution is in the hands of government. It is because, they have power and authority in hand to do so.
On the other hand, we also have specialists who have spent their life in studying and researching factors leading to environmental pollution. These professionals suggest that the measures to eradicate pollution are with the government bodies, but they can be implemented with co-operation from a common man.
It is my vehement belief that the real change to bring right attitude to eradicate can only be achieved by changing the mindset of all people who can give to pollution will be affected by same. To put it in perspective, if industrialists understand the importance of pollution, they will take all necessary measures to prevent their factories from any kind of contribution to pollution. Same applies to every stage and sector of population.
In conclusion, from all the points discussed above it is clear that government and people should work hand in hand to eradicate circumstances for pollution, with one vision and one goal - Pollution free 2020.
- Car-ownership has increased enormously. Is this good for traffic jam. What are the measures to be taken by government. 61
- Belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 78
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or disagree 87
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse 56
- Belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment and people should work hand in hand to eradicate circumstances for pollution...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47154471545 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23657813904 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593495934959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7816458118 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.363636364 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150221497121 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522210794341 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690335267909 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760573103306 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427260872049 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.