Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?

Essay topics:

Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?

The importance of recycling everything that is possible which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The significant influence of each house should separate their rubbish to recycling has sparked the significant impact over this trend on government''s laws more severals to make it legal in recent years. It can be agreed that this important fact that nowadays became more important than ever. Therefore, this essay will elaborate how people opnion about their feel and how the government may effort this issue and thus it will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reasons why people that really care about recycling are feelling that are not doing enough because still plent of plastics, papers that could be separated from cans, packets and others to improve the recycling efficiency, but the most conspicuous one steams from the fact that industries might change their packages making recycables to improve this process. As an illustration, a University of Adelaide study has shown that 87% of developed countries have an apprimorated way to designate their rubbish throughout the whole process. Hence, these countries are fully prepared to reduce the amont of non recycable materials.

However, in my opionion there remain some drawbacks which might overwhelm the significant impact of wach house has at the least 3 torrents for differents type of materials. For instante, one designate for plastic, other for paper, carboards and similars, and one for glass and metal.

From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that in my opnion recycling depends of each person that want a health environment looking after theirselves in day by day is really important, although the government could make venues to collect and separate the recycable material should not be overlooked.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-02-04 daniellima126 80 view
2019-10-15 vandana2715 88 view
2019-09-13 daniellima126 85 view
2019-07-23 nicah 55 view
2019-06-09 nalaikgenious 61 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, really, so, still, therefore, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32876712329 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75305831407 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.2931598792 50.4703680194 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.6 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2 20.9669160288 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227466856462 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735232405981 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704959134704 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120468669832 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680447925567 0.0609392437508 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.