The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualification in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers.
The depicted table enumerates the ratio of pupils living in the UK pursuing British language tutors training in two respective years 2007/8, 2008/9, and the percentage of selected males.
Overall, it is evident that the female had experienced the highest trend as compared to male in both particular years, whereas the figure for male slightly plummeted over the given periods.
To initiate, in terms of TOEFL the figure for the female in 2007/8 is almost three times that of the male in the same time frame. However, roughly a quarter ratio of the male seems to have qualified for the job in 2007/8. Moreover, the figure for female seems to prevail male by approximately 12000 in the following year 2008/9 where around 26 percent of men were qualified.
Furthermore, in the context of the Cambridge course nearly three-quarter ratio of female was obtaining the English language course in 2007/8 from which roughly one-quarter ratio of the male had chosen. In addition, the figure for female in 2008/9 is almost five times that of male, although exactly 12 percent of the male were selected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the three countries from 1990 to 2004 87
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 67
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 39
- The chart below shows the information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVDs or video. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09836065574 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57622311876 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7495661504 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192622318607 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955697123832 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564169263591 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127203435856 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646153187714 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.