The chart gives information about the tons of air pollutants from different sources from 1990 to 2005.
The line graph illustrates how many tons of pollutants released into the air from various sources between 1990 and 2005.
At the first glance, total air pollutants experienced a drastic decline over the period shown. Additionally, air pollution caused by industry was much higher than other sources.
Looking at the graph in detail, there were 7 million tons of air pollutants in total in 1990, followed by a sharp decrease to just over 3 million tons after a fifteen-year period. Meanwhile, industry released nearly 5.5 million tons of air pollutants in 1990. The figure then significantly dropped to a half of that in the next six years before gradually falling to 2 million tons in 2005.
In 1990, the number of air pollutants sent out was the same from both transports and households, at less than 1 million tons. After three years, the figure of transports slightly rose to 1 million tons, and stabilized at the end of surveyed period. At the same time, the number of pollutants from households lost its popularity, then plummeted to a mere 0.2 million tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | quanganh3110 | 84 | view |
- The chart below show different types of transport go to and from work in 1960, 1980, 2000. 56
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages 54
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000. 84
- In some countries the criminal trials are shown on TV and the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantage 81
- the chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year old spend chatting on the internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97790055249 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74872844669 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4973466385 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298402843634 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14096336099 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985421302439 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203822243337 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955554911218 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.