Job selection has been a burning global issue. Some specialists suggest that the past is a better time for finding a job that has a high success ratio than the present. Personally, I disagree with this suggestion.
On one hand, what I put in my priority is the accuracy in selecting a career. The fact is that the modern world owns the peak of technology development. As a result, the finders are certain to possess conditions to spend their time searching for the information online. Therefore, because the online store provides a huge amount of information, people have a tendency to gain enough information that is necessary. Correspondingly, their decision about what job they are supposed to take is more precise. More importantly, it is suggested that the education system today is bound to be more flourishing than that of the past. Accordingly, people incline to have a more stable background of knowledge. For this reason, they are able to readily perceive the information that they receive. Hence, it is possible for them to choose a job that is more suitable for them. Beyond any doubt, the modern world offers lots of convenient conditions for people to look for the future path.
On the other hand, it is claimed that the present has extremely many kinds of jobs to choose from. Consequently, the mistake in selecting the job is certain to exist. However, it is just applicable to a minority. In fact, the finders always have an effective way in this work. In that case, they are highly likely to do it without difficulty. In addition, it is obvious that the economics of the country develop over time. Successively, it stands a golden chance for people to have a better live condition. Subsequently, there is a likelihood that it stops them from falling into the stressful moments. Thus, their mind is apt to experience more relaxation; moreover, their brain tends to be wiser. Thereupon, it is the essence of a decision that is enjoyable. By and large, the claim that people are more likely to make the flaw in job identification is unrealistic.
In summary, for all the mentioned above, the present selection is a compelling topic. It is strongly advised that the specialists should take my writing into great consideration to guideline an appropriate policy on job selection.
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 70
- TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hly likely to do it without difficulty. In addition, it is obvious that the econom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92287917738 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9324104758 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52442159383 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.816933624 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6538461538 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9615384615 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0735225198455 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0208376775283 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273857912736 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540148945515 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400068599544 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.