Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion.
Of late, people are of the opinion that enjoying movies on their mobile gadgets and tablets outweighs the fun over the silver screen while others have a perception that an exhilarating experience in movie theatre outmatches the entertainment quotient than any other means. In my opinion, based on the requirement of the situation, the mode of viewing the motion pictures to have opted.
On the one hand, people who have a liking towards the comfortable use of mobile phones in order to enjoy movies, have some justifications. Firstly, the movie tickets nowadays are very expensive. The substantial growth in the entertainment industry has led to market monopoly which has resulted in increased prices. Secondly, the popcorns and snacks sold in the theatres presently are costlier than the costly tickets of the motion pictures. Thus, for the real movie experience, an average family spend thousands of rupees that can upset monthly budget.
On the other hand, the other people tend to be inclined to go for the silver screen for an entertaining experience and they have explanations to advocate the same. Firstly, the surround sound system with Dolby Digital Technology which has taken a step up. The kind of experience people get from the surround sound atmosphere and 3D pictures in animation movies enliven the pictures shown. Secondly, people like to go to the cinema also to get the feeling of large screens. The size of the screen gives a vibrant and vivid definition of the magnificent movies running. These trigger an adrenaline rush which is difficult to obtain from mobile gadgets and tablets.
In conclusion, people may have different preferences based on their perceptions as well as their convenience; however, viewing one in theatre provides a larger than life experience.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-27 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 78 | view |
2019-09-29 | Agni | 56 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 61
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...anations to advocate the same. Firstly, the surround sound system with Dolby Digital Technol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... The kind of experience people get from the surround sound atmosphere and 3D pictures in ani...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19310344828 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80229225009 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0751746878 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121256743157 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038287096507 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372255005183 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690322910293 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295440028558 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.