Science has no meaning without religion
Running the gamut from the electricity we use to cook our food to the cars that we use to transport, all of which are a direct consequence of scientific theorems and results. The prompt recommends that the science behind these amenities have no meaning without religion. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that science does not need religion to have meaning for two important reasons.
To begin, science challenges various beliefs of religion and in the process engenders new religious beliefs. To illustrate this, it was widely believed that earth was flat by several religions before 20th century. However, scientific experiments proved contrary to the proclaimed belief that the earth was flat. One such experiments involved in fathom the shape of earth based on the visibility of sunset from two different altitudes. If the earth was flat, one would not be able to explain the visibility of the sunset from higher altitude after seeing it from lower altitude. Hence, this experiment proved that the earth was round and in doing so, these experiments challenged the widely believed religious claims and provided rationality to the people who follow them. Religion also evolved to acclimate to these new discoveries and few of them changed their ideals to align with the current world view. Thus, proving my point of view.
Furthermore, science clarifies the rationality behind the beliefs of religion. For instance, in Hindu religion, it is suggested to visit temples for peace of mind and clarity of thinking. Science allows one to reason this recommendation - it is a well known fact that temples are a sacred place of worship and the ambience in temples is quiet and beatific. According to therapists and neurologists, there is significant evidence that one can concentrate better and attain a peace of mind in a quiet place. Consequently, it is evident that science gives meaning to the religious belief of attaining peace in temples. The above example illustrates that it is science that provides meaning to religion and not vice-versa. Thus, this proves my point of view.
Ofcourse, some argue that it was religious beliefs behind the famous scientists that led them to discover and invent things. However, one could say that it was their intrinsic passion to question common religious beliefs and find answers for them. In conclusion, I reiterate the aforementioned examples that strongly suggest that science has meaning without religion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Dipesh1234 | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Yam Kumar Oli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | Rasika0511 | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 58 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | ManthanW | 50 | view |
- Science has no meaning without religion 54
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 50
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, including tel 82
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 50
- "The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine: “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nning the gamut from the electricity we use to cook our food to the cars that we us...
^^^
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...se to cook our food to the cars that we use to transport, all of which are a direct...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23690773067 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77746984754 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513715710723 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.716306396 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311158266598 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106002644241 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14920790114 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204717765962 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099821651662 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.