University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. To want extent to you agree or disagree. Give reasons and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience
The writer argued that the university should accept equally number of males and female students in every subject, this will not only lead to lack of meritocracy in the admission process but also it negated the fact that sometimes there is significant difference between the number of each gender that apply to a particular subject.
In some subjects, the number of each gender that apply is significantly different, for example, more women tend to apply to Nursing Science than men while Mechanical Engineering tends to have more male applicants. Furthermore, let us imagine a hypothetical situation where the department of Mechanical Engineering in a university received 200 applications with 180 and 20 male and female applicants respectively. The department has the capacity to admit 100 students, going by the writer’s argument the department should admit only 40 students since the number of admitted female students should equate that of male students. The department will be operating below it capacity and this is not sustainable.
More so, the policy if deployed will significantly discourage meritocracy since the university admission board will be working hard to ensure equal number of each gender in all department. Imagine a situation where 100 boys and 200 girls applied to the department of Nursing Science in certain university and the department is to admit 200 students. However, after the entrance examination 150 girls passed the required cutoff mark while only 50 boys were able to make the minimum required score. Following the policy and for the department to operate at its capacity, they should admit the 100 boys irrespective of the fact that only 50 of them actually passed the entrance examination while leaving out 50 girls that actually passed the interest examination.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the writer because if such policy is implemented it will definitely harm the spirit of meritocracy in the admission process and render the number of students admitted in each course subject to the number of applicants from both genders which does no good to anyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | Chemberleen | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27810650888 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92313082383 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48224852071 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3568497062 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.4 106.682146367 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162738873598 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669779204647 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711689249712 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124798188077 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746394686669 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.